Cookie Preferences

We use essential cookies to keep you signed in and the Platform working. We also use analytics cookies to understand how you use LexIQ Law Tutor so we can improve it. You can accept all cookies or decline non-essential ones. Read our Cookie Policy for full details.

What AI tools are available for legal research and how should students use them?

AI legal research tools include Harvey, CoCounsel (Thomson Reuters), Lexis+ AI, and general-purpose models like ChatGPT. Students should use them to supplement — not replace — traditional research, always verifying outputs against primary sources.

all 2 min read

The legal research landscape is being transformed by AI. Understanding these tools — their capabilities and limitations — is essential for modern law students.

ToolProviderKey Features
HarveyHarvey AIBuilt on GPT-4; trained on legal data; used by Allen & Overy and others
CoCounselThomson ReutersIntegrated with Westlaw; document review, legal research, drafting
Lexis+ AILexisNexisConversational legal research with citations to Lexis content
LuminanceLuminanceAI-powered contract review and due diligence
CasetextThomson ReutersAI-assisted brief analysis and legal research

Tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini can assist with legal research but have significant limitations:

  • Strengths: Explaining legal concepts, brainstorming arguments, drafting outlines, summarising long documents
  • Weaknesses: Hallucinating case citations, providing outdated law, lacking jurisdiction-specific accuracy, no access to subscription databases

3. Best Practices for Students

  1. Use AI as a starting point, not an endpoint: Generate initial research directions, then verify everything on Westlaw/LexisNexis
  2. Never cite an AI-generated case without verification: AI models frequently invent plausible-sounding but non-existent cases
  3. Specify jurisdiction and date: Always tell the AI you need English law (or whichever jurisdiction) and specify whether you need current law
  4. Cross-reference multiple sources: Do not rely on a single AI tool — compare outputs across tools and against primary sources
  5. Document your process: Keep a record of the prompts you used and the verification steps you took

4. Ethical Considerations

  • Academic integrity: Check your university's policy on AI use in assessments
  • Confidentiality: Never input confidential client information into public AI tools
  • Disclosure: If your university requires disclosure of AI use, comply fully
  • Professional responsibility: Lawyers remain personally responsible for the accuracy of their work, regardless of whether AI assisted

Pro Tip

LexIQ's AI Chat Tutor is designed specifically for law students — it provides explanations grounded in UK legal principles and encourages you to verify its outputs against primary sources, building good research habits from the start.

Key Takeaway

AI legal research tools include Harvey, CoCounsel (Thomson Reuters), Lexis+ AI, and general-purpose models like ChatGPT. Students should use them to supplement — not replace — traditional research, always verifying outputs against primary sources.

Was this guide helpful?

Your feedback helps us improve our content for law students and educators.

Want personalised guidance?

Our AI tutor can explain any concept in detail, mark your essays, and create practice questions for your specific modules.